Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A12's 80.3 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 XL is an older device than the Samsung Galaxy A12, but Google could make it a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A12 captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy A12 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A12 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A12 counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.