Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A12, with a overall score of 87.5 against 80.3. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy A12, even when both were released only 1 months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10, so it provides some extra features and better performance.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more vivid display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A12 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a camera that is just as good as Galaxy A12's camera, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A12 counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.