Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A12 is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 80.3 against 77. The Galaxy A12 is a notably newer phone than the HTC U Ultra, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. HTC U Ultra features a better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
HTC U Ultra features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A12 counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A12 also has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% more battery capacity. Galaxy A12 takes a bit better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.