Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a bit better than the HTC U11, getting an 80.3 score against 77.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy A12 is incredibly newer than HTC U11, it is thicker and heavier. HTC U11 has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
HTC U11 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A12 has much more storage to store more games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A12 features a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.