Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A12 is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 80.3 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A12 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A12 has older 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG G7 Fit has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. Galaxy A12 features a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy A12 also has a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A12 counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.