Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 is a bit better than the LG V10, having an 80.3 score against 78.6. Galaxy A12's body is way newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG V10. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Galaxy A12 has a newer 10 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, giving you a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a quite superior hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has more cpu cores. The LG V10 features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per inch of display and a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The LG V10 features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A12, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A12 features a way better battery performance than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.