Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy A12, with an 82.5 score against 80.3. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is older than Galaxy A12, it's construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ has a better screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A12 has a much better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Galaxy A12 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.