Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A12, having a overall score of 81.3 against 80.3. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than Samsung Galaxy A12, it's construction is somewhat thinner and way lighter. LG V35 ThinQ has a way better looking display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a way higher pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A12 takes clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera. Galaxy A12 features a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.