Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A12's global score of 80.3. The LG V40 ThinQ body is lighter and thinner than Galaxy A12, although it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The LG V40 ThinQ has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better count of pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A12, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A12 has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG V40 ThinQ has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy A12, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.