Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy A12's overall score of 80.3. Even when the LG Velvet and Galaxy A12 were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG Velvet is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The LG Velvet counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, more pixels per display inch and a little bit bigger display.
The LG Velvet counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. The LG Velvet counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the LG Velvet also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and a much better (4K) video definition.
The LG Velvet features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A12, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A12 has superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.