Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A12's score of 80.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A12. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, so it provides you some additional features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a bit larger display, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch of display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A12, because it has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A12 has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.