Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A12, having a global score of 86.2 against 80.3. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A12, but it is a little bit lighter. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A12 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Moto G200 5G's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A12 one. The Moto G200 5G takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A12, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light photography, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.