Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-12-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A12 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a score of 80.3 against 75.8. Although Galaxy A12 is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it is way heavier and thicker. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A12 has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto Z Force counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto Z Force has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A12, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A12 takes a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A12 has a much better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.