Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 80.3 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A12 design is way newer, but noticeably heavier and way thicker than Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A12, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A12 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A12 also has a much more mega pixels back camera. Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.