Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A12's 80.3 general score. The Motorola razr (2020) body is just a bit lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A12, even when both were released with only 3 months difference. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better 876 x 2142px resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures. The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A12, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A12 has a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.