Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is slightly better than the Galaxy A12, getting a score of 80.8 against 80.3. These devices have Android OS, but Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also thicker and incredibly heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with just a little better performance than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Nokia XR20 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a little larger display, a better screen density and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Nokia XR20 counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A12, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A12 features just a little better battery lifetime than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4630mAh.
Nokia XR20 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also has better video frame rate and a bigger aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.