Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Samsung Galaxy A12, getting a overall score of 89.7 against 80.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is older than the Samsung Galaxy A12, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a higher pixels density and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a 48 MP camera in the back and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a lot higher (4K) video resolution. Galaxy A12 features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.