Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A12's overall score of 80.3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A12, but it's a little heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy A12, because it has a bit bigger screen, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and much more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a battery duration that's just as good as the Galaxy A12 one.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy A12, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher video definition and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.