Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than Galaxy A12's 80.3 score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A12, but it's somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a bit larger display and a way better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery duration that's just as good as Galaxy A12's battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A12, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.