Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has an overall score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy A12 design is extremely thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were released with only 9 months difference. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A12 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A12. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A12 features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A12 has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.