Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A12's global score of 80.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than Galaxy A12, we must note that it's also an older, a little heavier and thicker phone. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a way better display density. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a processor that is just as good as Galaxy A12's CPU, both have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy A12 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A12 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A12 has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.