Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A12's general score of 80.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Galaxy A12 were released only 5 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a camera that's just as good as the Galaxy A12 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better video quality. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.