Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Galaxy A12's 80.3 general score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A12 has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is extremely thinner but notably heavier than Galaxy A12, and they were released with only 3 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A12, because it has a higher pixel amount in each display inch, a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a larger display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A12, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A12, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A12 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.