Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 has a general score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the Sony Xperia Z4v's 78.8 overall score. The Galaxy A12 construction is way newer, but a little bit thicker and notably heavier than the Sony Xperia Z4v. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A12 has 10 version and Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1.
The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional GPU. Xperia Z4v has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a really longer battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 20.7 megapixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.