Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A12, having a general score of 82.7 against 80.3. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide all the same operating system features. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A12, but it is just a bit lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy A12 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A12 has greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a way better (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.