Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a score of 80.3 against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy A12 body is just a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a higher pixels density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution camera, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A12 has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A12 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.