Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G, having a overall score of 85 against 82.1. The Apple iPhone 8 is an older phone than Galaxy A13 5G, but Apple was able to make it extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. The iPhone 8 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has 2 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 750 x 1334px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density. Galaxy A13 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
IPhone 8 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.