Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is just a bit better than Galaxy A13 5G, having a score of 84.5 against 82.1. Even though iPhone XS Max is notably older and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A13 5G, it's design is still somewhat thinner. The iPhone XS Max features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a much greater screen density and a way higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px.
Galaxy A13 5G and iPhone XS Max both feature extremely similar storage capacity to install games and applications, they have the same internal storage. Apple iPhone XS Max features a faster processing unit than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features just a bit better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera. Galaxy A13 5G has a way better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.