Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A13 5G has a score of 82.1, which is slightly better than the LG V30's 79.1 global score. The Galaxy A13 5G is a way newer cellphone than LG V30, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V30 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A13 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
The LG V30 features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a much better pixels density. The LG V30 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A13 5G has a way better battery life than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Galaxy A13 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.