Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G's overall score of 82.1. These phones work with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 version. LG V50 ThinQ is an extremely older cellphone than Galaxy A13 5G, but LG could make it a little thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A13 5G has improved battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.