Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-03 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, having a global score of 87.1 against 82.1. Galaxy Note9's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, but it is just a little bit heavier. Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a lot better pixel density.
The Galaxy Note9 has a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A13 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.