Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-12-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a score of 82.1, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has older 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is incredibly older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a lot better screen pixel density and a bigger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a 50 MP camera in the back, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.