Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-01-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A14 5G, with a 77.8 score against 73.4. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is newer and incredibly thinner, but a little heavier than the Galaxy A14 5G. These phones work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A14 5G has Android 13.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 12 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, because it has a just a bit higher display density, a bigger screen and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A14 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A14 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.