Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is just a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G, getting a score of 84.5 against 77.4. The Apple iPhone XS Max is a incredibly older and a little bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A15 5G, but Apple could make it just a little thinner anyway. IPhone XS Max has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit better display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has much less brightness, and they both have a same size display, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a little bit greater pixels number per inch in the display and a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution. Galaxy A15 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A15 5G has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57 percent bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.