Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G, having a score of 81.6 against 77.4. The Google Pixel 2 construction is a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy A15 5G, even though it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bigger screen. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A15 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.