Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G's overall score of 77.4. The LG V50 ThinQ is a just a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but they are equally thin. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
LG V50 ThinQ has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A15 5G has superior battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.