Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having an 87.1 score against 77.4. Galaxy Note9 is a way older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Galaxy Note9 counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images and videos in low-light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note9, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A15 5G, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.