Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an extremely older cellphone than Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung was able to make it much lighter and thinner anyway. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a bigger camera aperture and a way more MP back camera.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.