Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having a score of 85 against 76.2. The iPhone 8 is a just a little thinner and noticeably lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. IPhone 8 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy A16 5G has a bit better looking display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a brighter display, a little better display pixel density, a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really larger screen. The Galaxy A16 5G features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent bigger battery capacity. The iPhone 8 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 5G. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.