Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G's global score of 76.2. Google Pixel 2 is a noticeably lighter phone than Galaxy A16 5G, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 2 counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy A16 5G. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a bit lower pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.