Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, getting a 79.1 score against 76.2. The LG V30 body is notably lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. LG V30 has a really superior performance than Galaxy A16 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V30 features a little sharper display than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The LG V30 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a way better battery life than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V30, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.