Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, getting a 79.8 score against 76.2. Moto Z4's body is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Moto Z4 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite worse screen density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a bit larger screen. Moto Z4 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A16 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a much better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Moto Z4, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.