Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 is a bit better than Galaxy A16 5G, getting a 79.6 score against 76.2. Xperia XZ3's design is extremely thicker but a little lighter than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XZ3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and much lower brightness, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Xperia XZ3 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xperia XZ3 has a superior camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a much lower 19 mega pixels resolution. Galaxy A16 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.