Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having a 77.8 score against 76.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a bit heavier but a lot thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones work with the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so they should provide all the same OS features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a quite better display pixel density, a bigger display, a way brighter display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.