Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting a general score of 85 against 72.7. The iPhone 8 design is a bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). IPhone 8 counts with a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a bit better display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a really bigger screen, more screen brightness and a just a bit better pixel density. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
IPhone 8 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.