Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s 72.7 score. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is thicker but lighter than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a smaller aperture and a way less mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.