Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting an 81.5 score against 72.7. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G 5G has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Moto G 5G is a way thicker and a little heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
Moto G 5G features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy A16 (Rumored) features a bit more vivid display than Moto G 5G, although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
The Moto G 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a back camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G 5G's battery life is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.