Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is much better than Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.7. These phones work with Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14 version. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Moto G200 5G is a somewhat thicker and a bit heavier device than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored).
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G200 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a bit lower pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A16 (Rumored) also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a battery life that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.