Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 has a global score of 79.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.7. Xperia XZ3's design is noticeably thicker but a bit lighter than the Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ3 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A16 (Rumored) has Android 14, providing a couple additional features.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A16 (Rumored). They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xperia XZ3 features a little bit better display than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has much lower brightness and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better display pixels density.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in low light situations and a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 (Rumored) counts with a really longer battery life than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 (Rumored). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.