Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), getting a 77.8 score against 72.7. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is a lot thinner but a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 14 OS (Operating System). Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because it has a larger screen, a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, much more brightness and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and although they both have a 50 MP back-facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A16 (Rumored), letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.